CFP

Call for Papers AI Council 2027

Share the system you actually shipped — what broke, what you rebuilt, and what you would do differently. Every track is programmed by practitioners, for practitioners.

Apply to speak
Past speakers

The people who have taken this stage

A decade of engineers, architects and researchers who came to show their work in detail, not in slogans.

Denis Yarats, Co-Founder & CTO, Perplexity

Co-Founder & CTO, Perplexity

Joe Spisak, Product Director - Llama, Meta

Product Director - Llama, Meta

Caitlin Colgrove, Founder & CTO, Hex

Founder & CTO, Hex

Wes McKinney, Principal Architect, Posit

Principal Architect, Posit

Why speak

Share what you actually shipped

  • An audience that builds

    You are talking to the engineers and architects who choose the tools their companies run on, not to a buying committee.

  • Depth is the format

    Talks run long enough to show the architecture, the trade-offs and the parts that did not work.

  • Your talk outlives the room

    Every session is recorded, transcribed and published, so the work keeps finding people long after the conference.

  • Programmed by practitioners

    Every track is curated by people who work in that stack, so a proposal is read by someone who knows the problem.

2027 tracks

Tracks built for the people who ship

Pick the stack you work in.

  • AI & Data Culture

  • AI Engineering

  • AI Launchpad

  • AI Security & Safety

  • Agent Infrastructure

  • Analytics & BI

  • Analytics & Data Science

  • Applied & Gen AI

  • Applied AI

  • Coding Agents & Autonomous Dev

  • Data Eng & Infrastructure

  • Data Engineering & Databases

  • Data Sci & Algos

  • Databases

  • Foundation Models

  • GenAI Applications

  • Inference Systems

  • Keynote

  • Lightning Talks

  • ML OPs & Platforms

  • Model Systems

  • Streaming

  • Workshops

FAQs

Speaker questions

Can't find your answer here?

Anyone building or operating AI infrastructure in production. You do not need to have spoken before — we care about the work, not the speaking record.

A specific system, a real constraint and an honest account of what happened. Architecture, numbers and the parts that failed beat a product overview every time.

Session lengths vary by track. We confirm the format with you once a proposal is accepted.

Yes. Submit each one separately so the curators can consider them on their own merits.

Yes. Every session is recorded, transcribed and published to the archive, so your talk keeps reaching people after the event.

Apply to speak

Submit your talk

Proposals are read by the track curators themselves. Tell us what you built and what you learned — the work matters more than the speaking record.

This opens your mail client with the answers filled in, addressed to the programme team.

Past talks

Watch what came before

Ten years of sessions from the archive. The clearest brief for a proposal is the talks that already worked.

Browse all talks
AI: too good to be true, too bad to be useful

AI: too good to be true, too bad to be useful

Why are some AI applications too good to be true and others total bunk? What is the reason behind the massive gap between over-promise and under-deliver? Let's talk about LLM history, mystery, and optimization to figure out where the f**k is all the automation.

Watch now
Born Different: How AI Natives Build Startups

Born Different: How AI Natives Build Startups

The playbook for building a startup hasn't changed much in 20 years - until now. Fewer people, different skills, and a completely different sense of what's possible. A new generation of founders is shipping products with smaller teams, moving faster, and using AI across every function. Join a group of AI-native founders for a candid look at how they're actually using AI inside their own companies - in their workflows, their code, their ops - and what the shape of their teams looks like as a result.

Watch now
The World Is Not Enough: RL’s Environment Problem

The World Is Not Enough: RL’s Environment Problem

While researchers may still opine about access to compute, most are hitting a new bottleneck: access to high-quality environments in which to post-train agents. Expanding agent capabilities will depend on how we curate and utilize data, much of which exists only in the minds of human experts today. This panel will explore the challenge of building environments, including the need to improve infrastructure reliability, the obstacles posed by subjective domains, and the challenge of achieving high variety. We’ll also discuss future opportunities, such as environments for long-horizon reasoning and continual learning, and what it will take to evolve environment design from a bespoke craft into a more automated, scalable discipline that consistently drives generalization.

Watch now
Modern Inference for Modern Workloads

Modern Inference for Modern Workloads

Practitioners from the companies at the frontier of inference and model development sit down to unpack what application developers need to understand right now: why fine-tuning is quietly resurging under the name "RL," how smart teams are compressing inference costs by shaping smaller specialized models, who owns the model routing problem, and why inference capacity is structurally behind demand — possibly for years.

Watch now
After the Lakehouse: Building Data Infra for the AI Era

After the Lakehouse: Building Data Infra for the AI Era

The lakehouse architecture solved a real problem — but AI has rewritten the requirements. Latency, compute separation, vector workloads, real-time inference pipelines: the demands look nothing like they did five years ago. Three engineers who helped build the modern data stack join us to debate what's actually changing under the hood, what's being thrown out, and what the next five years look like for the teams who have to ship on top of it.

Watch now
The End of the Internet As We Know It

The End of the Internet As We Know It

In a recent New York Times op-ed, Mozilla CTO Raffi Krikorian warned that the informal detente that kept the internet secure — where writing software and finding vulnerabilities were equally hard — is over. Raffi sits down with Pete Soderling to go deeper: what the Mythos moment means for builders right now, how teams should think about AI as co-author rather than tool, the economics of open source in a world of expensive foundation models, and whether open models can offer a credible alternative to the frontier labs. Read Raffi's NYT essay: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/15/opinion/mythos-open-souce-internet.html

Watch now

Ready to take this stage?

The next edition is programmed by practitioners. Tell us what you built and what you learned.

Apply to be a speaker